Yea, BUT we are under the dispensation of Grace which not only affords us salvation if accepted, but intuitively bestows upon us personal responsibility--acceptance of our OWN wrong doing. Translation: because of Adam, flesh is sinful, because of Christ our soul is healed. I am sure the good bishop knows this
Nice one, but you forget the judgment against the church with Arawak...(your words 'any church'). Further, you are veering in a different lane. The question is about the students who were not in the video and still being punished. And whether you appreciate this fact or not Frazier represents a congregation and by extension, church.
I think there is an area set aside for assessment for Conduct/Behavior on one's diploma (at least it was on my sjc diploma) and that is based on all of your activities positive or negative at school
Seriously? Are we now in defining terms mode? Is there not a universal understanding of what a graduation ceremony is? Are you suggesting that there is misplaced sentimental attachments to this event...really?
So...in the absence of truth you support the punishment for all...not only is that kind of thinking unsupported globally, it's not even wise or discerning, it is recklessly irresponsible. Caution, whenever one argues in the absence of proof in support of something, it's not an argument anymore, it's blind zealotry.
Different argument thisisours. The question on law and order, I fully support. On the question about unfairness let be clear: those students not involved in the incident are being wrongly and unjustly punished. Further, to accept the stand that All should be punished puts an asterisk to each of their diploma and really hurts their academic future. How dare one man is allowed to condemn the whole lot without indiscriminate cause, and we sit down in collective agreement over the daunting future for these student. Absolutely unjust
Are you implying that our legal system is rigged, not independent, all around a joke? Just want you to go on record. Do recall the land dispute between the church and Arawak, or Randy Frazier, etc..
In full agreement. This is a fool's game. Luckily, the generation to come is always smarter than the present: there is no stopping the determination and progress of the youth. Shame on the bishop and sjc
Rontom says...
Yea, BUT we are under the dispensation of Grace which not only affords us salvation if accepted, but intuitively bestows upon us personal responsibility--acceptance of our OWN wrong doing. Translation: because of Adam, flesh is sinful, because of Christ our soul is healed. I am sure the good bishop knows this
On Parents to sue over cancelled graduation
Posted 21 June 2013, 3:55 p.m. Suggest removal
Rontom says...
Then that begs the question doesn't it?
On Official event cancelled? Class of 2013 goes it alone
Posted 20 June 2013, 6:17 a.m. Suggest removal
Rontom says...
Kinda like a jp wedding instead of a church...okay
On Parents to sue over cancelled graduation
Posted 20 June 2013, 6:14 a.m. Suggest removal
Rontom says...
Nice one, but you forget the judgment against the church with Arawak...(your words 'any church'). Further, you are veering in a different lane. The question is about the students who were not in the video and still being punished. And whether you appreciate this fact or not Frazier represents a congregation and by extension, church.
On Parents to sue over cancelled graduation
Posted 19 June 2013, 8:32 p.m. Suggest removal
Rontom says...
I think there is an area set aside for assessment for Conduct/Behavior on one's diploma (at least it was on my sjc diploma) and that is based on all of your activities positive or negative at school
On Official event cancelled? Class of 2013 goes it alone
Posted 19 June 2013, 8:24 p.m. Suggest removal
Rontom says...
Seriously? Are we now in defining terms mode? Is there not a universal understanding of what a graduation ceremony is? Are you suggesting that there is misplaced sentimental attachments to this event...really?
On Parents to sue over cancelled graduation
Posted 19 June 2013, 8:12 p.m. Suggest removal
Rontom says...
So...in the absence of truth you support the punishment for all...not only is that kind of thinking unsupported globally, it's not even wise or discerning, it is recklessly irresponsible. Caution, whenever one argues in the absence of proof in support of something, it's not an argument anymore, it's blind zealotry.
On Parents to sue over cancelled graduation
Posted 19 June 2013, 8:08 p.m. Suggest removal
Rontom says...
Different argument thisisours. The question on law and order, I fully support. On the question about unfairness let be clear: those students not involved in the incident are being wrongly and unjustly punished. Further, to accept the stand that All should be punished puts an asterisk to each of their diploma and really hurts their academic future. How dare one man is allowed to condemn the whole lot without indiscriminate cause, and we sit down in collective agreement over the daunting future for these student. Absolutely unjust
On Official event cancelled? Class of 2013 goes it alone
Posted 19 June 2013, 5:05 p.m. Suggest removal
Rontom says...
Are you implying that our legal system is rigged, not independent, all around a joke? Just want you to go on record. Do recall the land dispute between the church and Arawak, or Randy Frazier, etc..
On Parents to sue over cancelled graduation
Posted 19 June 2013, 4:52 p.m. Suggest removal
Rontom says...
In full agreement. This is a fool's game. Luckily, the generation to come is always smarter than the present: there is no stopping the determination and progress of the youth. Shame on the bishop and sjc
On Official event cancelled? Class of 2013 goes it alone
Posted 19 June 2013, 4:25 p.m. Suggest removal