Sands should not be asked to resign, he should be fired! The only reason he might not be is because Minnis is too politically weak to do so!

... but when the same 'hustle' takes place with something you don't agree with he should be fired, right? It seems the concept of what principle means eludes you!

… I think it is relatively obvious that this was never about test kits, if it were those kind hearted donors could have sent them by courier. The fact that these residents could enter while less privileged Bahamian citizens who are stuck in the US and want to come home are being jerked around, speaks volumes!!

Do conch stalls have drive thru windows?

... these kits (actually swabs) could have been sent by Fed Ex if they were really that important. Obviously something more is going on here!

no Mudda. this is my perspective:

1) One kidney doctor has already died from COVID-19 (Judson Eneas).

2) Dr Sands recently said that around 15 COVID positive cases are doctors, that did not include nurses.

3) They just recently had to close a ward because of one COVID patient who had no symptoms.

4) The way I see it, is the director of the department has a duty to protect himself, his staff and other patients who use that department. That would involve having rules in place. Bahamians simply do not like to follow simple rules. Look at how many people cannot follow the simple advice to have one designated shopper per household (every time I go in the grocery store there are people in groups of 2 or 3 three shopping or wearing their masks below their noses).

5) Imagine what would happen to other patients if they had to close dialysis to sanitize.

I find it more egregious to ask the elderly to remove their shoes going through security for domestic flights!

… and you honestly believe that a doctor should wipe the bottom of a resistant patients shoes in this scenario or engage staff for this additional function as opposed to asking ALL persons to simply leave their shoes? Really?
Without knowing all the details that the doctor and staff would know, the story is clear that there are those who had no difficulty complying with the suggestion! Do they even have alcohol in amounts to provide this additional service? I don't know, but this is akin to business saying that if you do not have a mask on you cannot enter their business, I do not see that as wrong, in this situation where a potential threat exists to others!!

It is well documented that COVID can be carried on the soles of shoes. It makes sense not to allow patients who are already vulnerable to be exposed to additional risk by creating simple rules. I applaud doctors who continue to try and treat the sublimely idiotic among us while risking their own lives!

... there are two kinds of kits one to determine if you have the virus now (that uses swabs in the nose) the other to determine with a finger prick whether or not you have antibodies that show that you already had the infection. They seem to have issues with both kinds of kits!

.. One of the issues was whether or not people were antibody positive for SARS or COVID-19 since there is some cross reactivity between some of the viral proteins. The specificity and sensitivity of tests have improved of late (the Brits have recently developed a new test) and once there is some evidence that a person is likely to have had the disease (COVID-19) by showing antibodies to past infection, we can take a chance at allowing them to work instead of locking them down with those who are antibody negative or have antibodies showing recent infection. For this purpose levels of antibodies is not as important. There is no clear evidence that a person can get this virus twice.